| _______________________ |
WASHINGTON -- Top infantry officials have one after an additional to rely on a tip network of in isolation spies who have constructed hundreds of reports from low inside Afghanistan and Pakistan, according to American officials and businessmen, notwithstanding concerns in in between a small in the infantry about the legality of the operation.
Earlier this year, supervision officials certified that the infantry had sent a organisation of former Central Intelligence Agency officers and late Special Operations infantry in to the segment to pick up informationsome of that was used to lane and kill people suspected of being militants. Many portrayed it as a brute operation that had been fast close down once an examination began.
But interviews with some-more than a dozen stream and former supervision officials and businessmen, and an hearing of supervision documents, plead it a opposite a story. Not usually are the networks still operating, their minute reports on subjects similar to the workings of the Taliban care in Pakistan and the movements of rivalry fighters in southern Afghanistan are additionally submitted roughly every day to tip commanders and have turn an critical source of intelligence.
The American infantry is mostly taboo from handling inside Pakistan. And underneath Pentagon rules, the armed forces is not authorised to sinecure contractors for spying.
Military officials pronounced that when Gen. David H. Petraeus, the tip commander in arch in arch in the region, sealed off on the operation in Jan 2009, there were prohibitions opposite comprehension gathering, together with employing agents to yield report about rivalry positions in Pakistan. The contractors were ostensible to yield usually extended report about the domestic and genealogical dynamics in the region, and report that could be used for "force protection," they said.
Some Pentagon officials pronounced that over time, the operation appeared to morph in to normal espionage activities. And they forked out that the administrator who set up the executive network, Michael D. Furlong, was right away underneath investigation.
But a examination of the module by The New York Times found that Furlongs operatives were still on condition that report utilizing the same comprehension entertainment methods as before. The contractors were still being paid underneath a $22 million contract, the examination shows, managed by Lockheed Martin and supervised by the Pentagon bureau in assign of special operations policy.
Under investigation
Geoff Morrell, the Pentagon press secretary, pronounced that the module "remains underneath examination by mixed offices inside of the Defense Department," so it would be inapt to answer specific questions about who authorized the operation or since it continues.
"I assure you we are committed to last if any laws were damaged or policies violated," he said. Spokesmen for Petraeus and Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the tip American commander in arch in arch in Afghanistan, declined to comment. Furlong stays at his job, operative as a comparison municipal Air Force official.
While the Pentagon declined to plead the program, it appears that commanders in the margin are in no pour out to close it down since a small of the report has been rarely valuable, quite in safeguarding infantry opposite rivalry attacks.
The bearing of the espionage network reveals tensions in in between the Pentagon and the CIA, that itself is using a growth fight opposite the limit in Pakistan.
In December, a wire from the CIAs hire arch in Kabul, Afghanistan, to the Pentagon argued that the militarys employing of the own spies could have catastrophic consequences, with assorted networks presumably colliding with one another.
The memo additionally pronounced that Furlong had a story of delving in to outlandish comprehension schemes, together with an piece in 2008, when American officials diminished him from Prague for perplexing to clandestinely set up computer servers for promotion operations.
How it began
The in isolation executive network was innate in piece out of disappointment with the CIA and the infantry comprehension apparatus.
There was a idea by a small officers that the CIA was as well risk averse, as well reliant on Pakistans view use and occasionally means to yield the infantry with timely report to strengthen American troops.
In addition, the infantry has complained that it is not technically authorised to work in Pakistan, whose supervision is peaceful to see the alternative approach and concede CIA espionage but not the participation of unfamiliar troops.
Paul Gimigliano, a CIA spokesman, discharged reports of a territory war.
"Theres no illumination at all on this in in between CIA and DoD," he said. "Its an issue for Defense to see intoit involves their people, after alland thats just what they"re doing."
Since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the Pentagon has used extended interpretations of the authorities to enhance infantry comprehension operations, together with promulgation Special Operations infantry on surreptitious missions far from spoken fight zones.
Concerns in D.C.
These missions have lifted concerns in Washington that the Pentagon is using de facto growth actions but correct White House management and with small slip from the blow up complement of congressional committees and inner controls dictated to forestall abuses in comprehension gathering.
The web of in isolation businesses operative underneath the Lockheed stipulate embody Strategic Influence Alternatives, American International Security Corp. and International Media Ventures, a communications association formed in St. Petersburg, Fla., with Czech ownership.
The Times is self-denial a small report about the executive network, together with a small of the names of agents operative in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
A orator for Lockheed pronounced that no Pentagon officials had lifted any concerns about the work.
"We hold the subcontractors are effectively behaving the work compulsory of them underneath the conditions of this charge order," pronounced Tom Casey, the spokesman. "We"ve not perceived any report indicating otherwise."
| _______________________ |
No comments:
Post a Comment